[“We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.”]
Wednesday, December 20, 2023
Review: "PREY" is the Best "Predator" Sequel to Date
Friday, August 12, 2022
Review: Steven Spielberg's "Duel" (Countdown to "The Fabelmans")
Duel (1971) – TV movie
Running time: 90 minutes (1 hour, 30 minutes)
MPAA – PG
DIRECTOR: Steven Spielberg
WRITER: Richard Matheson (based on his short story)
PRODUCER: George Eckstein
CINEMATOGRAPHER: Jack a Marta (D.o.P.)
EDITOR: Frank Morriss
COMPOSER: Billy Goldenberg
Primetime Emmy Award winner
THRILLER/ACTION
Starring: Dennis Weaver, Jacqueline Scott, Eddie Firestone, Lou Frizzell, Lucille Benson, and Carey Loftin
Duel is a 1971 action-thriller and television film directed by Steven Spielberg. The film is based on the short story, “Duel,” which was first published in the April 1971 issue of Playboy Magazine. It was written by Richard Matheson, who also wrote this film's teleplay (screenplay). Duel the movie focuses on a business commuter pursued and terrorized by a driver in a massive tanker truck.
Duel was originally a “Movie of the Week” that was broadcast on ABC November 20, 1971. Duel was the first film directed by Steven Spielberg, and it is considered to be the film that marked young Spielberg as an up and coming film director. Following its successful air on television, Universal had Spielberg shoot new scenes for Duel in order to extend it from its original length of 74 minutes for TV to 90 minutes for a theatrical release. This extended version of Duel was released to theaters internationally and also received a limited release in the United States. The theatrical version is the subject of this review.
Duel focuses on David Mann (Dennis Weaver), a middle-aged salesman. One morning, he leaves his suburban home to drive across California on a business trip. Along the way, he encounters a dilapidated tanker truck that is driving too slow for David. He drives his car past the tanker, but a short while later, the tanker speeds up and roars past David's car. After David passes the tanker again, the truck driver blasts his horn. That sets off a cat and mouse game in which the tanker's seemingly malevolent driver pursues David's car and terrorizes him. And nothing David does can help him to escape the pursuit.
I think that the mark of a great film director is his or her ability to get the most out of his or her cast and creatives and a maximum effort from the film crew. Duel is a display of excellent work on the stunt performers and drivers. Together with the camera crew, sound technicians, and film editor, they deliver a small screen film that offers a big cinematic duel between a small car and relentless tanker truck.
Dennis Weaver delivers a performance in multiple layers as David Mann. Weaver makes Mann seem like a real businessman type, a cog-in-the-machine and ordinary fellow just trying to make it in the world. Weaver does not seem to be acting so much as he is living and fighting for survival.
Behind all this is the young maestro, Steven Spielberg. It is not often that TV movies get the cinematic treatment, but I imagine that the original production company, Universal Television, was quite pleased when they first saw this film. It is genuinely thrilling and unsettling, and the truck driver (played by stuntman Carey Loftin), who is unseen except for his forearm and waving hand and his jeans and cowboy boots, can unnerve like the best horror film slasher killers. The way that dilapidated tanker truck moves makes me think that it was a precursor to the shark in Jaws, which would become Spielberg's first blockbuster theatrical film just a few years (1975) after the release of Duel.
Richard Matheson's script for the film seems to want to make the viewer really wonder about the driver. Is he evil... or a maniac... or demented prankster? Why does he focus on David Mann? Has he done this before? What is his endgame with David? Does he want to kill him or just punish him. Does he want to torment David before he crushes him and his car beneath his tanker truck's wheels?
Steven Spielberg brings those questions to fearsome life on the small screen and later big screen. He makes Duel work both by scaring us and David with the big bad truck and by fascinating us with all these questions concerning the trucker's motivations and David's fate. Hindsight is just as accurate as foresight in the case of Duel. Steven Spielberg was great, practically from the beginning.
7 of 10
A-
★★★½ out of 4 stars
Friday, August 12, 2022
NOTES:
1972 Primetime Emmy Awards: 1 win: “Outstanding Achievement in Film Sound Editing” (Jerry Christian, James Troutman, Ronald LaVine, Sid Lubowm Richard Raderman, Dale Johnston, Sam Caylor, John Stacy, and Jack Kirschner – sound editors); 1 nomination: “Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography for Entertainment Programming – For a Special or Feature Length Program Made for Television (Jack A. Marta)
1972 Golden Globes, USA: 1 nomination “Best Movie Made for TV”
The text is copyright © 2022 Leroy Douresseaux. All Rights Reserved. Contact this site or blog for reprint and syndication rights and fees.
Monday, February 1, 2021
#28DaysofBlack Review: "THE BLACK PANTHERS: VANGUARD OF THE REVOLUTION"
[Stanley Nelson Jr. is an acclaimed and multiple Emmy Award-winning documentary filmmaker (The Murder of Emmett Till, Freedom Riders). Instead of only relying on academic and official history for his 2016 film, Black Panther: Vanguard of the Revolution, Nelson fashions history from the many stories of many of the individuals involved with the Black Panthers. When these people are onscreen, that is when this Emmy-winning documentary is at its best, and that is why I think Nelson's film would be even more illuminating as a television series.]
TRASH IN MY EYE No. 4 of 2021 (No. 1742) by Leroy Douresseaux
[This review was originally posted on Patreon.]
The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution (2015)
Running time: 114 minutes (1 hour, 54 minutes)
Rating: Not rated by the MPAA
WRITER/DIRECTOR: Stanley Nelson
PRODUCERS: Laurens Grant and Stanley Nelson
CINEMATOGRAPHERS: Antonio Rossi, Rick Butler, Allen Moore, and Clift Charles
EDITOR: Aljernon Tunsil
DOCUMENTARY – Race, Politics
Starring: Elaine Brown, Kathleen Cleaver, Flores Forbes, Emory Douglas, Mike Gray, Jeff Haas, Erika Huggins, Phyllis Jackson, Jamal Joseph, Akua Njeri, Donna Murch, and Marvin X
The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution is a 2015 documentary film from writer-director Stanley Nelson. The film uses archival footage and interviews of surviving Panthers and law enforcement officials to chronicle the rise and fall of the Black Panther Party, one of the most controversial and captivating organizations of the 20th century. The filmed premiered at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival and later received a limited theatrical release in September of that same year.
Originally called the “Black Panther Party for Self-Defense,” the Black Panther Party (also known as the BPP or “Black Panthers”) was a revolutionary Black organization that was founded in 1966 in Oakland, California. Considered by some to be a “Black nationalist and socialist organization,” the Black Panthers core practice was to monitor behavior of police officers against Black people and to challenge police brutality in Oakland. The group also created a number of community social programs, the best known being the “Free Breakfast for Children Programs” and community health clinics. The group had chapters in several cities and municipalities in the United States and also an international chapter that operated in the country of Algeria for three years.
The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution provides a broad overview of the BPP, while specifically focusing on key moments and occurrence's in the group's history. One of those moments concerns J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and his extensive program to destroy the Panthers. This program (COINTELPRO) included police harassment, infiltration of BPP membership by FBI informants, and surveillance and tactics to discredit and criminalize the Panthers.
I think what best makes The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution successfully work as a documentary film are the interviews. There is something about hearing the words of former Panther members; law enforcement that had interaction with the BPP; journalists and reporters who covered them; and historians who continue to study them that brings this documentary's story to life.
Some of the best known Panthers: Huey Newton, Eldridge Cleaver, and Fred Hampton are seen only in archival footage because they are no longer living. [Chicago police killed Hampton in what is considered an assassination by many former Panthers and people who study the BPP.] Another famous Panther, Bobby Seale, is still living, but apparently did not participate in this film. This archival footage is informative, but I did not take to it the way I did the interviews.
The interviews of living subjects turns The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution into a kind of oral history. When oral storytelling is told by someone who is good at it or really has a sense of the story he or she is telling, it brings history and even myths to life, perhaps, even giving them a new life. At the beginning of this documentary, someone says that the history of the Panthers is unique to individual members, because that history reflects an individual's experience as a member of the BPP – what he or she saw being inside the BPP. The oral history and interview aspect of this documentary exemplifies that.
I think The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution is the first step to getting a deeper understanding of the Black Panther Party. The next thing to do is to make available each history or her-story of BPP members. That is the flaw in this documentary. Sometimes, it approaches the sweep of history by sweeping past a lot of it – perhaps, understandably for practical reasons.
Still, The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution reveals that the story of the BPP is not simply one of Black militants posturing with guns or acting like criminals. It is more intimate and complex, made of many stories, not just one history. This documentary is smart enough to recognize that.
8 of 10
A
Thursday, September 29, 2016
NOTES:
2016 Black Reel Awards: 1 nomination: “Outstanding Documentary” (Stanley Nelson-Director)
2016 Image Awards: 1 win: “Outstanding Documentary (Film)”
2016 Primetime Emmy Awards: 1 win: “Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking” (Stanley Nelson-produced by, Laurens Grant-produced by, Sally Jo Fifer-executive producer, Lois Vossen-executive producer, and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS)
The text is copyright © 2016 Leroy Douresseaux. All Rights Reserved. Contact this site for reprint and syndication rights and fees.
-------------------------
Amazon wants me to inform you that the link below is a PAID AD, but I technically only get paid (eventually) if you click on the ad below AND buy something(s).
Friday, November 22, 2013
Review: "Death of a President" Riveting, Troubling
Death of a President (2006)
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: UK
Running time: 97 minutes (1 hour, 37 minutes)
MPAA – R for brief violent images
DIRECTOR: Gabriel Range
WRITERS: Simon Finch and Gabriel Range
PRODUCERS: Simon Finch, Gabriel Range, and Ed Guiney
CINEMATOGRAPHER: Graham Smith
EDITOR: Brand Thumim
COMPOSER: Richard Harvey
DRAMA/MYSTERY/THRILLER
Starring: Hend Ayoub, Brian Bolland, Becky Ann Baker, Robert Mangiardi, Jay Patterson, Jay Whittaker, M. Neko Parham, Chavez Ravine, and Malik Bader
In his mock documentary (also known as a “mockumentary”), Death of a President, director Gabriel Range presents a scenario in which U.S. President George W. Bush is assassinated in October of 2007. Death of the President pretends to be an investigative documentary that examines the key players and events surrounding the killing of President Bush, several years after the as-yet-unsolved murder occurred.
Death of a President follows the events leading up to the assassination and its aftermath, and the film also features a bevy of talking heads, which includes the people around the president, murder suspects, and their families. In his hypothetical film, Range focuses on the fallout that follows Bush’s murder – specifically the media’s reaction, the rush to convict a Muslim as the assassin, and the machinations of newly installed President Cheney to grab more presidential powers.
Since its appearance at the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival, Death of a President has been highly controversial, and the producers had a difficult time finding a company to distribute the film to U.S. theatres. Ultimately, Newmarket Films, which handled Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, distributed the film in the U.S.
I like this movie, although I did find the scenes in which President Bush was shot and the ones occurring at the hospital where he later died to be in poor taste. Like him or not, he is (as of this writing) a sitting U.S. President, and to portray his death in so brutal and perhaps cavalier fashion is to traffic in mean-spiritedness and carelessness.
On the other hand, what takes place before the assassination and after is riveting stuff. In the scenes leading up to the shooting, director Gabriel Range creates a riveting thriller that quietly races to its damnable turning point. After Bush’s death, Range and his co-writer Simon Finch display a knowledge of the American mass media, of law enforcement (in particularly the FBI) and how they work and react to big events that is surprising considering they are not Americans. Their spin on how Vice-President Dick Cheney would react if he became President after an assassination is dead-on (and maybe a little obvious considering Cheney’s actions as Vice-President). Who doesn’t think Cheney would move to consolidate more power for himself with a Congress and a country reeling from shock, reluctant to challenge him, and desperate for leadership in such a time of crisis.
Range apparently specializes in these kinds of dramatizations of probable future events, such as his TV film, The Day Britain Stopped (which I’ve never seen). He’s so-so at presenting interviews with the fictional talking heads involved in the events of Death of a President. Some of the interviewees don’t come across as authentic, so the film sometimes feels phony. Still, Range has created an engaging, unforgettable “what if,” and he smartly realizes what is most frightening about a U.S. president being assassinated. Such an event could very well mean the definite beginning of the certain end of this grand experiment called the United States of America.
7 of 10
B+
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
NOTES:
2007 BAFTA TV Awards: 1 nomination: “Best Visual Effects”
2007 International Emmy Awards: 1 win: “TV Movie/Mini-Series” (UK)
Updated: Sunday, November 10, 2013
The text is copyright © 2013 Leroy Douresseaux. All Rights Reserved. Contact this site for syndication rights and fees.