Friday, February 5, 2010

Review: First "Imitation of Life" is Less Attractive Over Time

TRASH IN MY EYE No. 59 (of 2004) by Leroy Douresseaux

Imitation of Life (1934) B&W
Running time: 111 minutes
DIRECTOR: John M. Stahl
WRITER: William Hulburt (from a novel by Fannie Hurst)
PRODUCER: Carl Laemmle, Jr.
CINEMATOGRAPHER: Merritt B. Gerstad
EDITORS: Philip Cahn and Maurice Wright
Academy Award nominee

DRAMA

Starring: Claudette Colbert, Warren William, Rochelle Hudson, Ned Sparks, Louise Beavers, Fredi Washington, Juanita Quigley, Sebie Hendricks, Marilyn Knowlden, Dorothy Black, Wyndham Standing, Henry Armetta, and Alan Hale

Although the 1959 color version directed by Douglas Sirk is better known, the 1934 version of Imitation of Life earned three Oscar nominations including one for Best Picture. If you’ve seen Sirk’s Technicolor cult classic of high melodrama, you really don’t need to see the older film (which covers the same themes), other than for the sake of curiosity.

In this black and white version, Beatrice “Bea” Pullman (Claudette Colbert) is a widowed, single mother of two-year old Jessie (Juanita Quigley). By chance and opportunity, she befriends a coloured domestic, Delilah Johnson (Louise Beavers), and her high yellow/mulatto daughter Peola (Sebie Hendricks). Delilah becomes Bea’s housekeeper and friend, and together they start a successful pancake restaurant (and later boxed pancake mix empire) that takes them from poverty to wealth.

But wealth doesn’t bring happiness. The adult Peola (Fredi Washington) comes to hate that she can’t pass for white because her dark-skinned mother has an irritating way of being part of her daughter’s life, so she eventually abandons Delilah, her “mammy.” Bea doesn’t have a man in her life, but when she finally meets Stephen “Steve” Archer (Warren William), teenage Jessie (Rochelle Hudson) falls in love with him.

The film is typical old school Hollywood drama replete with gorgeous art direction, sets, and costumes. The meat and bones of the story are, however, weak. The acting is suspect and lame, not because of technique or skill, but because of effort. The entire cast (except for the brassy Ned Sparks as Bea’s manager Elmer Smith) seems to be half stepping, as if they’re not really into it. They may have given their all, but appearances and results say otherwise. A melodrama needs intense and/or over-the-top performances; that makes the drama palatable. The filmmakers just don’t give that here. There is one thing they do with a passion: Ms. Beavers’ Delilah is a hideous stereotype that is so awful and stomach turning that I could almost believe the KKK financed this film.

3 of 10
C-

NOTE:
Academy Awards 1935: 3 nominations: “Best Picture,” “Best Assistant Director” (Scott R. Beal), and “Best Sound, Recording” (Theodore Soderberg, sound director)

-------------------


Thursday, February 4, 2010

Review: "Another Gay Movie" Not Just Another Teen Movie

TRASH IN MY EYE No. 245 (of 2006) by Leroy Douresseaux

Another Gay Movie (2006)
Running time: 94 minutes; not rated by the MPAA
DIRECTOR: Todd Stephens
WRITERS: Todd Stephens, from a story by Tim Kaltenecker and Stephens
PRODUCERS: Jesse Adams, Karen Jaroneski, and Todd Stephens
CINEMATOGRAPHER: Carl Bartels
EDITOR: Jeremy Stulberg

COMEDY

Starring: Michael Carbonaro, Jonah Blechman, Jonathan Crane, Mitch Morris, Ashlie Atkinson, Scott Thompson, Graham Norton, Stephanie McVay, John Epperson, James Getzlaff, Darryl Stephens, and Richard Hatch

Innocent (but coy) Andy Wilson (Michael Carbonaro), flamboyant queen-in-training Nico (Jonah Blechman), jock Jarod (Jonathan Chase), and nerdy Griff (Mitch Morris) all want to lose their virginity, and they’re hoping to find the right guy for the job. Andy has a crush on his San Torum High School teacher, Mr. Puchov (Graham Norton), but he’s unsure of how to approach him. Jarod, Griff, and Nico aren’t getting anywhere, either. After numerous failed attempts, these gay teens decide to set a goal for themselves: lose their virginity before the Labor Day bash thrown by their bull dyke friend, Muffler (Ashlie Atkinson). They’ll take on the whole town if they have to in order to get laid, even if it means Nico might hop into bed with “Survivor” Season One winner, Richard Hatch (playing himself).

Todd Stephens’ Another Day Movie is a hilarious send-up of the teen comedy genre, but with a gay twist. However, the film isn’t solely a parody, nor is it a gay movie with a message or socially redeeming value. Another Gay Movie is rife with naughty gags, gross out scenes, gerbil jokes, and enough sloshing bodily fluids to make even the hardcore movie watcher blanch.

Stephens’ film takes as its template the late 90’s comedy hit, American Pie. However, as debauched as its filmmakers and fans would like to believe it to be, the American Pie franchise literally has nothing on Another Gay Movie when it comes to gross out humor. It’s queer and loudly so, and also comfortable with being queer. Raucous scenes of men humping and being humped are on display, as if nothing were wrong with gay sex (not that there’s anything wrong that). As a comedy, Another Gay Movie is also a proud gay in-joke filled with gags, sketches, and jokes involving S&M, sex in public restrooms, gerbils, masturbation, inserting objects in the rectum, etc.

Seeing this isn’t all that upsetting because of the soft pink haze that envelopes the film’s world. Stephens and his creative team present a world awash in shades of pink, with lavender and pastel chasers. Stephens has also set in his film in a kind of camp version of suburbia that recalls John Waters movies, and in spite of the dirty nature of the film’s comedy and low production budget, the neighborhoods of AGM seem surprisingly clean and upscale. In addition to the obvious Waters’ vibe, Another Gay Movie also references such teen comedy or teen-themed films as Bring It On, Carrie, Not Another Teen Movie, and Porky’s among others.

Still, to sell this movie, a filmmaker needs a willing cast, and he certainly has that. Everyone is gladly game for this outsider romp, whether it’s Jonah’s Bleckman’s Nico, the colorful club-kid or Ashlie Atkinson’s lesbian on steroids, Muffler. Scott Thompson of "Kids in the Hall" fame also makes a nice turn as Andy’s father, Mr. Wilson. Mitch Morris as the madly-in-love-with-his-friend Griff and Michael Carbonaro as the film’s central horn dog, Andy, are the standouts and would be good characters on their own.

Another Gay Movie was not rated by the MPAA, and with several scenes featuring genitals (both flaccid and engorged), nudity, and a host of sexual situations, there was no point submitting it to the august, but controversial ratings board. This is for movie lovers who aren’t offended by alternative lifestyles and methods of sexual pleasure. It’s outrageously funny, and the work of a director, cast, and crew who didn’t hold anything back. Another Gay Movie is the gay makeover for which the teen comedy has been waiting since Porky’s pretended to be entirely straight.

7 of 10
A-

Saturday, December 02, 2006

-----------------

 

Anne Hathaway Talks Walt Disney's "Alice in Wonderland"

ALICE IN WONDERLAND - New Image and Anne Hathaway Q&A

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Anne Hathaway received a Best Actress Academy Award® nomination for her work in Jonathan Demme’s 2008 drama “Rachel Getting Married.” Her performance in that film also brought her Golden Globe®, Screen Actors Guild Award® and Independent Spirit Award nominations, as well as a number of critics groups' awards for Best Actress. She will be seen in the Garry Marshall-directed romantic comedy “Valentine’s Day,” in which she joined an all-star ensemble cast. She also stars with Jake Gyllenhaal in Edward Zwick’s drama “Love and Other Drugs,” due out later this year.

Hathaway made an auspicious feature film debut in the starring role of Garry Marshall’s hit comedy “The Princess Diaries,” and reprised her role in “The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement.” She has more recently earned widespread acclaim for her work in the hit comedy “Get Smart,” opposite Steve Carell; “Becoming Jane,” in which she starred as Jane Austen; the smash hit “The Devil Wears Prada,” with Meryl Streep; and Ang Lee’s award-winning drama “Brokeback Mountain,” with Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger, for which she shared in a SAG Award® nomination for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture.

Hathaway currently stars as the White Queen in Tim Burton's epic 3D fantasy adventure “ALICE IN WONDERLAND.”  She recently answered questions about the Tim Burton film:

Q: Is this an adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s books?

A: This is “Alice in Wonderland” 10 years later. The story isn’t the same. And in re-reading the book in preparation for the film, I noticed that a lot of it is Alice trying to figure out who she isn’t by process of elimination. She knows that she isn’t all the things that people are saying that she is, and so, by going through all of them, she gets a better idea of what she is. And in the Tim Burton “ALICE IN WONDERLAND,” Alice is trying to name who she is without using the process of elimination in a similar way. There’s a great line in it, where someone says, “You seem like Alice, but you’ve lost your muchness.” That’s my favorite line. So I think if the book is about Alice exploring her imagination, this one is about Alice finding her soul.

Q: Why have his books been enjoyed for generations?

A: In my opinion, what makes a great book is something that is universally specific. I didn’t read the “Alice” books when I was a child. I read them when I was in college. I was really into Nabokov, and apparently, he was really into Lewis Carroll, so I thought it was a good idea. So I read it from the perspective of a young woman becoming a woman—and I really related to it, the idea that you’re never the right size, that you could drink something to make you feel smaller, or eat something to make you feel bigger. I remember that it just appealed to me because I understood it. On the surface, it’s kind of light and fantastical, but it actually does play into a lot of deep, psychological fears we have—inadequacies that we feel we have, insecurities, the way we relate to the world around us. And in Wonderland, the world is hyper-emotional. It doesn’t make sense. People don’t make logical, emotional sense, and people feel things very, very grandly, and it’s just full of contrarians. So then, you have this young girl—who’s quite sensible, especially for a young girl—navigating her way through it. Sometimes, you feel like you’re the supporting cast of characters, the Wonderland crew, and then other times, you feel like you’re Alice. Like I said, when something is that universally specific—universal enough that it’s just a great, entertaining story, but specific enough that you can find yourself in it and relate to it at different points in your life—I think that could possibly explain why people keep going back to it.

Q: Why are Carroll’s characters such great fodder for film?

A: One of the reasons why Lewis Carroll’s characters work so well in cinema is because they’re wildly imaginative and there’s no one way to interpret them. Because Lewis Carroll played around with words and concepts, and because the characters appeal to the imagination, I feel there are as many interpretations as there are imaginations in the world. It depends on what your take is.

Q: And why are the characters also great for a Tim Burton movie?

A: One of the reasons why “ALICE IN WONDERLAND” and Tim are such a great match is because nothing is exactly as it seems in Wonderland. Nothing is entirely good or entirely bad. There’s a mixture of life and texture and intention, and I think that’s something with which Tim is really comfortable. And if you look throughout his filmography, nothing is ever what it appears to be or should be. So, I think in that sense, living in the questions, the ambiguity, but also the specificity of the world—these are things in which Tim excels as filmmaker. I believe the filmmaker and the subject matter complement each other really beautifully in this film.

Q: Describe the character you play.

A: I play the White Queen. When I was trying to work her out, I kept saying to myself, ‘She is a punk-rock, vegan pacifist.’ So I listened to a lot of Blondie, I watched a lot of Greta Garbo movies, and I looked at a lot of the artwork of Dan Flavin. Then a little bit of Norma Desmond got thrown in there, too. And she just kind of emerged. And I really like her. When I first came onboard the project, Tim talked a lot about the relationship between the sisters, and that really opened the character up to me a lot. She comes from the same gene pool as the Red Queen. She really likes the dark side, but she’s so scared of going too far into it that she’s made everything appear very light and happy. But she’s living in that place out of fear that she won’t be able to control herself. There’s a lot to play around in. It was awesome. I had so much fun.

Q: Why did you want to be in this film and play this role?

A: I’m just going to be a gushy fan for a second. I love Tim Burton—he’s one of my all-time favorite filmmakers. For as long as he’s been making films, I’ve been going to them opening weekend. And I watch them again and again on DVD. I love his aesthetic. I love his ability to pace as a filmmaker, his comfort with things that are kind of odd—he also finds a way to ground them. I think it’s very unusual to find a filmmaker who isn’t trying to be different for the sake of being different, to show you something you’ve never seen, but is actually yearning to stretch the limits of his imagination. So everything Tim does comes from a very pure place. And I think that’s why his movies, in spite of the sometimes off-beat subject matter, have such heart. I love that. “Alice” itself is such a classic, amazing story, and it has been told so many times—but when I heard the combination Tim Burton/”ALICE IN WONDERLAND,” I knew it was going to be a very specific, very wonderful adventure. I love my character. I love that she seems to be the voice of reason—you’d think that she would be the good queen. But she didn’t have to be. I really had a lot of fun playing around with this idea, that what’s good in Wonderland is not necessarily good in the real world.

Q: Describe what she does with her hands, and the way that she walks.

A: That was absolutely derivative from the costume because, [costume designer] Colleen Atwood, who’s just such a genius, made this dress that has so much detail to it, that’s so complex, but it doesn’t look at all heavy. It looks like if you didn’t attach a weight to it, that it would float up into the air and spin around. And I noticed the way the dress moved when I was in it. It was never my intention to create a perfect light. I just wanted her to arrive in certain places, and in my head I just thought, the way she walks, she occasionally bumps into things and doesn’t know how she got there. And she’s a little dopey and kind of ditzy, but at the same time, very clued in. And so, the walk just happened. I took very, very fast footsteps, and I noticed the more languid I could make my arms, the more it looked like I was gliding. And that’s when the Norma Desmond thing happened. I remember being really nervous about the first take. And I did it and Tim smiled, so it was nice. That’s the feeling on set. ‘Show me your imagination. Show me how far you can take this.’ And I always had absolute trust that if it went too far, Tim would pull it back. He actually has a story in his head that he wants to tell. So usually what would happen, it would be some kind of combination of straightforward story and imaginary weirdness. And it was just nice the way it all fit together.

Q: What’s going on with the White Queen when we first meet her?

A: The White Queen has had her crown taken from her, and she’s basically powerless to stop her sister’s reign of tyranny. Her sister is the Red Queen. And so, she is waiting. She’s basically taken a vow of non-violence that she cannot break, and she’s waiting for her champion to arrive to help her reclaim her throne—the citizens of Underland would like to see that happen. They want to see her restored to power, because she’s kind.

Q: What is the relationship between the White Queen and the Red Queen?

A: The relationship between the White Queen and the Red Queen is not good. They are sisters, but I don’t think it was ever particularly good. I just think that my character would never admit that she doesn’t like her sister. I think she tries to make excuses for her. She tries to find little things to love about her, but she really doesn’t that much. I think, from her perspective, if the Red Queen were just a bit nicer to her—allow the possibility that they could be friends, allow the room for love—that she would be willing to give over to it. But the Red Queen just rubs her the wrong way. They’re not buddies—they’re just related.

Q: Who plays the Red Queen?

A: Helena Bonham Carter, in addition to being one of the most brilliant women I’ve ever had the pleasure to talk to, is so much fun as the Red Queen. She has so much energy that she gives to it. And her characterization is so lovely and demanding, not child-like but childish, and selfish and impossible to please. Then, at other times, she’s really vulnerable and sad, because this person is going to be lonely forever, because she’s just so darn selfish. She’s endlessly entertaining in the role. Her look and the dedication that it takes—three, four hours to get into that hair and makeup.

Q: Talk about the actor who plays The Mad Hatter.

A: The actor who plays the Mad Hatter, Johnny Depp—I have so much fun watching him in all of his movies as an audience member, so to actually get to watch him perform live is such a treat. He’s so inventive—and he’s kind, just a very kind, warm man. But to actually watch him in his element, in his zone, just acting, it’s a thrill. I want him to do theater so that everyone else can get in on it. He’s very powerful. I just felt very privileged to get to watch him.

Q: What does Mia Wasikowska bring to her role?

A: Mia Wasikowska is an absolute delight of a young woman. She’s so playful and natural and down-to-earth—but she also has this ethereal quality to her, she feels timeless. What she brings to Alice is very, very difficult to pull off. Every time I do a scene with her, I’m just amazed at what she’s doing with it and that a young actress can bring so much gravity to this world. It’s somewhat eerie, the way she’s able to communicate feeling and where Alice is at that moment. It was lovely to work with her, just to get to observe that.

Q: What is your impression about how this film is being made?

A: I took a very Zen approach to filmmaking on this one. It sounds silly, but I had no idea what was going on. I walked in and it was like being in a neon-green terrarium—green on all sides, and tons of empty space. Tim knew what was going on—he was the one that is in control of it. All I needed to do was hit my mark and say my lines, and wait for Tim to tell me that we’re ready to move on. And that was my approach to it. I didn’t put any other pressure on myself. I just showed up and acted.

Q: What are you wearing in this movie?

A: I’m wearing a dress designed by Colleen Atwood. It’s grand and the most fragile dress I’ve ever worn in my life. I love it so much. It’s beautiful. If you ever had a dream of being any kind of fairy princess, this is the dress you would wear. I love the idea that it’s this idealized, fairy-tale Queen, but it is in a Tim Burton movie, so there’s darkness mixed up with it as well.

Q: What do audiences have to look forward to with this film?

A: Because the world of this film begins and ends in the imagination of Tim Burton, you’re not seeing a movie that’s been shot on locations that you’ve seen a million times. Because this world has no rules, you’re seeing so many different and separate brushstrokes and colors and characterizations somehow getting combined through Tim. And what I think you’re getting is an absolute exploration of the imagination. I think that’s the essence of the book, and I think that’s the spirit Tim’s brought to the film. Everybody on the film was so clever, so creative, so imaginative—and I think that’s what the film is about—how can we tell a story that honors the imagination in the most imaginative way humanly possible? And that’s such a fantastic idea. [END]

Walt Disney and Pixar Celebrate Oscar Nominations

Disney and Pixar Animation Studios Celebrate Milestone Oscar® Year with 8 Nominations for “UP” and “The Princess & the Frog”

“UP” is Only the Second Animated Film in Oscar® History to Ever Receive a “Best Picture” Nomination

BURBANK, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios celebrated a milestone Oscar® year as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced five Oscar nominations today for “UP” (from Disney-Pixar), including a coveted spot in the “Best Picture” category for only the second time in Academy Award® history, and three nominations for Disney’s “The Princess and the Frog,” it was announced today by Rich Ross, chairman of The Walt Disney Studios, and John Lasseter, chief creative officer for Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios.

UP,” directed by Pete Docter and produced by Jonas Rivera, was also recognized by Academy members in the categories of “Animated Feature Film,” “Music (Original Score),” “Sound Editing,” and “Writing (Original Screenplay).” The only other animated film in Oscar history to receive a “Best Picture” nomination was Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast,” which competed in the 1992 awards ceremony.

Directed by Ron Clements & John Musker, and produced by Peter Del Vecho, “The Princess & the Frog” received nominations today in the categories of “Animated Feature Film,” and "Music" (Original Song) for two of the songs written by composer/songwriter Randy Newman (“Down in New Orleans” and “Almost There”).

Commenting on the announcement, Ross said, “We’re proud that ‘UP’s’ inspiring journey and Tiana’s tale of triumph in ‘The Princess and the Frog’ captivated the hearts and minds of the Academy. We’re also proud that both have joined the storied list of Disney and Disney-Pixar favorites in earning nominations for ‘Best Animated Feature Film.’”

Lasseter added, “This is a great moment for all of us in the animation community, and we’re all so incredibly excited that ‘UP’ has been nominated by the Academy in two key categories, especially the ‘Best Picture’ category. This is a great tribute to the filmmaking talents of director Pete Docter, producer Jonas Rivera, and the entire team at Pixar, who worked so hard to create such wonderfully entertaining characters, and develop an original story filled with emotion, humor, adventure, and excitement. Receiving a ‘Best Screenplay’ nomination is enormously gratifying, and underscores why the film has been so universally entertaining and appealing. And we’re thrilled that Michael Giacchino’s score for ‘UP’ has been recognized by his colleagues for adding so much to the emotion and excitement of Carl and Russell’s journey. We’re equally proud that ‘The Princess and the Frog,’ our latest hand-drawn animated feature from Disney, has been recognized in the ‘Best Animated Feature Film’ category, and that two of Randy Newman’s brilliant songs were also honored. With its fantastic animation, original characters, memorable music, and beautiful artistry, it ranks along with many of the Studio’s very best efforts.”

Pete Docter and Jonas Rivera said, “We are humbled and grateful to the Academy. Being nominated among these remarkable animated films is such an amazing privilege. On top of that, to be honored as one of the best pictures of the year is just mind-blowing. It’s truly been a long, wonderful ride getting here, and with all sincerity it really does feel like we’re floating on air.”

Ron Clements & John Musker added, “This rare honor is a thrill, not only for us, but for the 400 or more artists who gave so much of their talents in bringing classical hand-drawn Disney animation in ‘The Princess and the Frog’ back to the big screen."

A summary of nominations for the two films from Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios is as follows:

Animated Feature Film - “The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements

Animated Feature Film - “Up” Pete Docter

Music (Original Score) - “Up” Michael Giacchino

Music (Original Song) - “Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman

Music (Original Song) - “Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman

Best Picture - “Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer

Sound Editing - “Up” Michael Silvers and Tom Myers

Writing (Original Screenplay) - “Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy [END]

-----------------------

A "Kick Ass" Preview

Fanboys and other assorted nerds are eagerly awaiting Kick Ass, the film adaptation of the Marvel Comics series from writer Mark Millar (Wanted) and John Romita, Jr.  The excellent movie box office news site is previewing 2010's big movies and have done one for Kick Ass.

The film is directed by Matthew Vaughn and written by Jane Goldman and Vaughn, who previously adapted Neil Gaiman and Charles Vess' illustrated novel, Stardust, for the screen.  I liked Stardust.  It looks like a British fantasy film that might have come out of the 1980s, and I think fans of fantasy films that are more like LadyHawke and less like Lord of the Rings will really enjoy it.

Concerning Kick Ass, I guess Nicolas Cage being in it means that it will either be a hit or a disaster.  There will be no middle ground.

Sell Your Own "Lost" Crap in Design Contest

National “Lost” Design Contest Launches on CafePress

Fans of ABC’s Hit Series “Lost” Gear Up for the Sixth and Final Season by Designing Authorized Merchandise on CafePress

SAN MATEO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As “Losties” gear up for ABC’s “Lost” sixth and final season, ABC Entertainment Group and CafePress, the online destination for user-designed apparel and gifts, unveil new ways for devoted fans to engage with this beloved series. “Lost” fans can now design and sell authorized show merchandise on CafePress and enter their new products into an exciting, national design contest.

The “Lost” design contest on CafePress invites fans to submit creative, new “Lost-inspired” merchandise designs in the following categories: The Island, Dharma Initiative, Airlines, Love “Square” and The Others. To enter the contest, fans will be asked to “tag” their designs with a special code based on the design category they choose and post the new product in their CafePress shop and Marketplace. Contest details can be found at http://community.cafepress.com/?p=769.

CafePress will accept design entries from February 3 – February 18. One winner from each of the above five categories will be chosen based on creativity, originality, aesthetics and concept. These five category winners will each receive a $200 CafePress gift certificate, a “Lost” DVD set and a T-shirt autographed by members of the cast. Subsequently, a “Lost” producer will choose an overall grand prize winner from the five category winners. This grand prize winner will receive an exciting, expense-paid trip to Oahu, Hawaii, the island where the series was shot.

Fans can visit CafePress to design custom items like T-shirts, Sigg bottles and tote bags, while also shopping for merchandise created by other show enthusiasts. As of today, “Lost” fans have designed more than 37,500 products at the “Lost” Fan Portal on CafePress.com, with many more being added daily.

“From the start, our ‘Lost’ viewers have proven to be a dedicated and passionate group. Over the years they have remained committed to the series, its characters and the unfolding story surrounding the survivors of Oceanic Flight 815,” comments ABC Entertainment Group Vice President of Business Planning and Development Mia Rondinella. “We’re so pleased to reward these dedicated fans with a fun and innovative new opportunity to express and share their passion for ‘Lost.’ We hope that the new ‘Lost’ fan portal on CafePress together with the ‘Lost’ design contest will enhance the enthusiasm already surrounding the sixth and final season.”

“Lost fans are incredibly passionate about the show, especially leading into the final season,” comments CafePress Vice President of Marketing Amy Maniatis. “Only a true fan knows the inside jokes and can inject their own special Lost passion into their merchandise designs, resulting in truly unique Lost t-shirts and gifts.”

In addition to designing and shopping for merchandise, “Lost” fans can also follow @losttees on Twitter to follow the “Lost” T-shirt craze, hear about “Lost” related news, and learn about other product giveaways and contests.

For more information, visit www.cafepress.com or http://shop.cafepress.com/losttv.


About CafePress
CafePress is the world's biggest destination for self-expression through merchandise. Each month over 11 million shoppers visit CafePress to buy or create T-shirts, mugs, posters and other gifts that reflect their interests, passions, beliefs and affiliations. Launched in 1999, CafePress has empowered individuals, Non Profits and businesses to create, buy and sell customized merchandise online using the company's unique print-on-demand and e-commerce services. Today, CafePress is a growing network of over 6.5 million members who have unleashed their creativity to transform their artwork and ideas into an impressive catalog of over 250 million unique gifts.

Learn more about CafePress at http://www.cafepress.com or on their international sites in Australia (http://www.cafepress.com.au), Canada (http://www.cafepress.ca) and the United Kingdom (http://www.cafepress.co.uk/).

Star Wars Toys Still #1

STAR WARS™ Maintains Top Spot as the #1 Licensed Toy and #1 Boys Toy Property in the U.S. for Annual 2009*


Driven by the Continued Success of Star Wars: The Clone Wars

The Power of the Force Continues To Dominate

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--It was a competitive year for boys properties, but Star Wars once again grabbed the top slot, demonstrating its enormous staying power even after 33 years. With 2009 year-end figures placing Star Wars 40% ahead of any other toy license, the Power of the Force continues to thrive, according to industry research company The NPD Group. U.S. retail toy sales for the license in 2009 exceeded $480M, supported by all-new episodes of Star Wars: The Clone Wars and a robust collector market engaged in the live-action Saga. Success in the toy arena continues to translate to many other licensed product categories, including publishing, apparel, consumer electronics and housewares.

Still an animation powerhouse in its second season on Cartoon Network, Star Wars: The Clone Wars continues to attract new fans in the key demographic of boys 6-11. Bringing an all-new Star Wars adventure to TV each week, the cutting-edge computer-animated series has kept the brand squarely in the public eye and has introduced an ever-expanding array of new characters, creatures and vehicles into the inter-galactic lexicon. The success of The Clone Wars has helped to keep Star Wars relevant for a new generation of boys, and the licensing success is now rivaling the heights experienced during the blockbuster live-action films.

In addition, 2010 marks the 30th anniversary of Star Wars: Episode V The Empire Strikes Back. Celebrating the fan-favorite installment of the live-action Saga, the milestone will be commemorated with a year’s worth of intergalactic activities – including massive fan events, charity screenings, exclusive product promotions and much, much more.

“After more than three decades, Star Wars continues to resonate with audiences and consumers, both in the boys demographic and with fans who’ve grown up with the franchise,” said Howard Roffman, President of Lucas Licensing. “The continued success of Star Wars: The Clone Wars is an indication that once again a whole new generation of young fans have been engaged by the Saga, and we are still able to connect with fans of the original movies with activities such as those surrounding the anniversary of The Empire Strikes Back.”

Lucasfilm, Star Wars, Star Wars: Episode V The Empire Strikes Back, Star Wars: The Clone Wars and related character names, vehicle names and properties are trademarks and/or copyrights, in the United States and other countries, of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. TM & © Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and trade names are properties of their respective owners

* Source: The NPD Group/Consumer Tracking Service [END]